77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
14. Inside the light from the position explained earlier mentioned, it really is concluded that a civil servant includes a fundamental right for being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be regarded for no fault of his very own and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the length of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
4. Record shows that the petitioner has long been booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the moment case. Though the petitioner has obtained bail in All those cases, it does, prima facie, set up that the petitioner is vulnerable to repeating the offence.
Even though there is no prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being heard, it holds little sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent in the home state, relevant case legislation from another state may be regarded because of the court.
“Making certain the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple highly regarded sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
The different roles of case law in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in the way that courts render decisions. Common law courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale behind their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and infrequently interpret the broader legal principles.
only around the ground of miscases remanded & only over the ground of misreading of evidence only within the ground of misreading here of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf from the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, and also the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf with the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for a dismissal based on absolute immunity, because they were all acting in their Employment with DCFS.
The regulation of necessity regarded and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it had been the illegal action called regulation of necessity..
In the event the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only done Should the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded on the allegations as a result they were nicely aware of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to generally be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
PACER allows anyone with an account to search and Identify appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and docket information. Register for any PACER account.
In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only finished If your employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well as the petitioner company responded to the allegations as a result they were properly conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Pakistan’s legal system is not without flaws: overhauling is overdue and also the regulation regarding murder demands serious reconsideration and clarification. For that time being, the minimum that can be achieved is to make certain that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.